The Company: Living Entity or
Machine?
Tom FitzGerald
How You Treat It Determines Its
Performance
People have always known instinctively that a human enterprise is a
living, breathing entity that grows and ages, sickens and heals,
flourishes and fails. It is
something that is organic in nature. It
has personality and the ability to learn and to reproduce. It
has personhood. It is
something that is much greater than the sum of its functions. It
is much different than the sum of its people.
This personhood is most easily recognized at both ends of the
spectrum of corporate success. World-class
companies exhibit a character of focus, power, and oneness that is
palpable even to a casual visitor. Companies
in deep distress show a personality that is equally vivid but
fragmented, fearful, and impotent.
All companies have this personhood, whether it is strong or weak,
potent or ineffective, motivating or destructive. These
corporate personae have inner lives at least as complex and as richly
embroidered as those of people. Not
only do these inner lives coexist with the external results of corporate
success and failure, but also actually precede and cause them. In
our work, we find about 150 attributes of corporate personality that can
cause, effect or predict bottom-line performance.
Entrepreneurial and charismatic leaders have always known this quite
intuitively and use it to lead, motivate and transform their companies. They
use their organizations' living energies to magnify their leadership and
their ambition for their companies. They
alter elements of their companies' inner lives to force changes in the
externals. They may not talk
about it for many would be too embarrassed, but they think about their
companies as persons.
For more than eighty years, definitely since the advent of
"scientific management", the company-as-machine paradigm has
become the model most used. It
is used particularly when growing, changing or improving organizations
is attempted.
Unquestionably, such a model has its uses. Certainly
it is easy to teach and understand. Undoubtedly
it lends itself to ready analysis. It
also has profound limitations. It
is as limited as the model of a human body without its life, without its
spirit.
Changing the inert, spiritless human body can only be done
mechanically. The results
can be no more than was done to it. The
body without its life can offer no response, no help. It
has no ability to further what has been done to it. Decay
is the only possible result.
Trying to change a company in any significant way using the
company-as-machine model is like that. Business
Process Reengineering is a prime example. It
is successful only about 30% of the time, a percentage comparable to
that of a placebo effect. Trying
to change it by coaching one person at a time is even less successful.
However, so pervasive has the company-as-machine model become that
many managers and consultants act as if it is the only one available. When
asked, they may speak about the company as a living entity. But
even then they are thinking of it as its culture or the sum of its
people.
This machine approach to corporate change is most often seen in the
more established and more bureaucratic companies. In
entrepreneurial organizations it appears more rarely. When
the machine approach does appear, the company ceases to be
entrepreneurial.
But an alternative to this company-as-machine model exists. The
company can be dealt with as a person possessing life, body, and soul. Treating
the company this way allows it (actually, forces it) to respond as a
thinking, competing organism to its leadership, its people, and its
marketplace. Treating the
company as a person evokes its personhood and simultaneously evokes
attributes only living creatures have. These
attributes include the ability to adapt and heal, to grow and flourish,
to change and even transform.
It takes a leader, as opposed to an administrator, to evoke this
living response. While it
would be nice for all companies to have leaders who have the instinct
and charisma to do this, it is not needed. A
body of knowledge and practice exists that allows any CEO to address the
organization as an entity and mobilize it, cause it to change, cause it
to heal. The process works
quickly and almost without effort because this approach draws upon the
company's innate instinct to heal and to succeed.
As with all fundamental techniques of leadership the process is
profoundly simple like walking or riding a bicycle. Like
walking and cycling it is almost impossible to analyze. It
is difficult to explain in words. But
the knowledge that it can be done coupled with a little help and
practice makes it so easy to learn.
As a CEO there are just three major steps, constantly repeated, that
you need to take. Perfection
is not needed and the steps become more effective with practice.
The first step makes the others easy and natural. Visualize
the company as a person. See
it. Hear it. Feel
it as an entity. Personify
it. Give it form, shape, and
colour within your mind. Identify
its personality both as it is and as it should be. The
more vividly you do this the more effective the other steps will be.
The second step is to evoke the company. The
most successful technique to do this is to call the management team
together. Whenever the
management team is knowingly and purposefully making decisions for the
business, the company is there too. As
you talk with the management team, remain aware that you talk with the
company too. As you decide
with them for the company's sake, you decide with it too. Saying
to the group (and the company), "We are the company", is a
powerful, empowering evocation. Also,
whenever you talk to your workers about the company, which should be
often, speak to the company through them and listen to the company
through them.
The third step is to increase the company's power, its potency, and
its authority. Embolden it. Embolden
it enough for it to make known its needs and its potential above and in
spite of the prejudices and preferences of individuals on the management
team and even the CEO's prejudices and preferences.
Simplifying the politics of the company is the way to do this. The
simpler the politics and the clearer the focus, the more powerful
becomes the spirit of the company. As
the company grows in potency and in clarity, workers at all levels begin
to respond to it as a separate entity. Creativity
grows. Morale improves. The
organization becomes more responsive to leadership. Leadership
draws on the inspiration, knowledge, and energy of its workers. The
key factors of the inner life of the company come into balance. External
changes follow.
Repeatedly, over the last twenty years we have watched managing
officers intuitively use these steps to turnaround companies and
transform their performance. Frequently,
we have used these steps ourselves to enable companies to sharply
increase their profits and renew themselves.
The steps may seem a little mystical, but they are as real as riding
a bicycle. It will take you
just a little time and effort to begin them properly. With
practice they will become innate and the results will occur faster. Once
started, it takes no time from your day and the results of the normal
course of business are magnified.
Treating the company as a living entity, causes it to be so, to
become more so. The more
definite its personhood becomes, the more it flourishes.
It happens first within the heart and mind of the CEO. No one else
need ever know.
© Copyright, Fitzgerald
Associates, www.managementconsultants.com
All rights reserved. Revised: February 28, 2007