CUSTOMER RISK ASSESSMENT
RON WELLS CCE
"Customer Risk" may be defined as the risk that a buyer will fail
to pay either due to financial constraints (bankruptcy) or due to dishonesty
(indefinite payment delays without good reason).
This is the main element of risk which is under the direct and active control of
the management of the buyer. The buyer’s management must be honest. The buyer’s
management must also be capable of operating the business effectively day to day
and of dealing with any crisis effectively.
Hence a perceptive assessment of the ability of the management of a customer /
buyer is as important as a competent assessment of the financial and commercial
information presented for analysis.
Customer Risk Analysis is the subject of numerous academic studies, text books
and courses. It is not possible to summarise this still expanding body of
knowledge in this publication. The interested reader is encouraged to study this
subject in more depth through reading appropriate texts, attending courses and
membership of a relevant professional group.
The most important tools used by credit analysts are:
- Financial information as to the condition and achievements of the buyer;
usually financial statements produced by the buyer in the form of a Balance
Sheet, an Income Statement (or Profit and Loss Account), a Cash Flow
Statement and explanatory notes.
-
Information as to the future plans and strategies of the buyer as
evidenced by executive announcements (accompanying the financial
statements), literature distributed to shareholders and the public at
large and Cash Flow Forecasts.
-
Performance information gleaned from other suppliers
(credit references),
banks (bank references), the seller’s own records, credit reference
agencies and public records such as court files and newspaper
advertisements.
-
Generally available information regarding the buyer’s industry and
market environment together-with information regarding the legal and tax
environment in which the buyer operates.
-
Personal visits to the buyer’s premises and market.
(See Customer Visits Strategy)
Financial information supplied by the buyer must be considered with extreme care
even if it is accompanied by a "clean" auditor’s report.
The first important point to bear in mind is that any such information is a
record of the past which does not necessarily indicate what the buyer’s
position may be in the present or future.
The Balance Sheet is particularly "static" and vulnerable to
manipulation. It is "static" in that it represents the asset and
liability position at the close of business on a particular day. The picture
before and after that instant in time will be different. It can be manipulated
because generally
accepted accounting practices give a great deal of flexibility to management
and auditors, to determine how various transactions, assets and liabilities
should be represented in financial statements. Hence it is vital to read and
analyse in depth all the notes that accompany financial statements.
Income statements suffer from the drawback of being vulnerable to
manipulation through the flexibility allowed by generally accepted accounting
practices. In particular the use of the accrual method (which entails profit and
loss adjustments not related to cash flow) can give a distorted picture of the
buyer’s achievements, and can lead to cash being paid out to shareholders (in
the form of dividends) and to tax authorities at a time of cash shortage.
Most credit analysts utilise well known financial-statement-based-ratios
to determine their credit decisions. This approach is well understood throughout
commerce and industry so unscrupulous executives are able to manipulate credit
analysts’ decisions by manipulating balance sheet and income statement figures
to produce "desired" ratios.
Customer Risk relates specifically (i) to the availability of cash to meet
payable commitments on due date and (ii) to the willingness of the buyer’s
management to pay.
The Cashflow Statement is the most reliable of those documents which usually
form the buyer’s set of financial statements. It reflects actual cash
movements during the review period so it will indicate;
A customer’s "defensive interval" is the time during which the
customer can continue to operate its business utilising only cash resources
(liquid assets) actually on hand on the relevant Balance Sheet date.
NOTE: Refer to
various publications and presentations by Dr George GALLINGER (Arizona State
University) for more information about ‘cashflow analysis’, the ‘cashflow
cycle’ and the ‘defensive interval’. Fax: (602) 965 8539. Email: bac524@mainex1.asu.edu
-
It is true that the future is less and less likely to resemble the past,
given the rapid pace of change being experienced. The challenge is to predict
the probability that the buyer’s management will be able to successfully cope
with the future.
In order to make an assessment, the credit analyst needs to;
Credit Scoring models are however able to provide a logical framework upon which
to work step-by-step through the analysis of a customer’s position, before making a credit
decision.
In order to develop a useful model a credit analyst would have to take into
account the requirements and peculiarities of the selling company and its
potential market. In addition any model should be tested as extensively as
possible before it is utilised. The subjective elements should be reviewed
regularly.
Refer to the Trade Credit
ScoreCard Article and PowerPoint
Presentation.
The company should create a method of calculating appropriate credit limits
based on the following criteria:
- Each unsecured limit should not exceed the maximum amount the company
could bear to lose without becoming bankrupt. A useful guideline to this
amount may be a proportion of the company’s "own funds"
(shareholders’ equity), say 10% for example.
- Each limit amount should not exceed the customer’s assessed ability to
pay, in the normal course of business. Attention should be given to the
normal pattern of a customer’s business; normal purchase levels, sales
levels, usual credit terms prevalent in the customer’s market, the
relative size of the customer’s business and its relative financial
strength.
- The limit amount should be sufficient to accommodate the customer’s
normal purchasing pattern. If it is not possible to meet this requirement
the company should explore the possibility of sharing the payment risk, with
a bank or credit insurance entity, transaction by transaction.
© Copyright 1998 R K WELLS
Go to Top